Saturday 17 December 2011

The Eternal Optimist

 

Photo from net uploaded by Atlaf Majid
Growing up in Assam in gloomy eighties had a toll on our psyche. The otherwise hyperemotional people didn’t have a single positive thing to think about. Already we gained a reputation for our step motherly attitude to humour and laughter; I clearly remember we felt guilty if we were enjoying something.
May be it is not normal to enjoy as everything is going from bad to worse.
All the schools, colleges, streets, shops buses- mostly remained closed.
Unexpected deaths were (still is) daily headlines so were the sense of losing identity prevailing everywhere.  
The effect of surroundings was terrible and on top of everything –the bombardment of negative, egotistic, remunerated news.
Conflict had no end  but the intolerance were at its peak  –among people /language /religion /media house/views ,politicos /students  parents and from left right centre and periphery everyone were against each other.
Those who had the power either betrayed or exploited our faith.
The situations lead to an era of darkness.
What we all wanted was little bit positive news. (ভাল খৱৰ, শুভ সংবাদ)
But there weren’t any ……

At that time two greats of contrasting characters came out with similar prayer-.
One was Bhabenndra Nath Saikia ,who accepted the society as it was but never given up and tried to bring changes being a part of the system.He wrote a full length play শুভ সংবাদ meaning Good news for  the moving theater of Assam so that prayer can be herded across the Bramhaputra valley
The other person I am talking about was a different person altogether .A master in his craft and far ahead of any other contemporary in case of the momentum of his thinking. So naturally when it comes to personal feeling about the surrounding; he was very cynical and far more frustrated than any one else.
 I have never met him but neither any other person in this universe .As the great craftsman  Sourav Kumar Chaliha lived in complete obscurity .The man whom we have known as the man who knew SKC best Surendra Nath Medhi was by mean less noteworthy  . Though petrified with the moronic behavior of natives it doesn’t mean that they (SKC and him) shy away for their responsibility for the society .Both SKC and Surendra Nath Medhi (the man who knew SKC best) were fierce critique of the all evils without any kind of fear. Be it insurgency (Like on death of journalist Parag Das ,or on issue of insurgencies ), or intellectual vacuum in the valley both of them came out with article/stories that can open the window of knowledge .  

Two decades ago may be still not old enough to wake up with a hangover on New Year’s dawn ; I was enjoying the sunshine with news paper in one hand and morning cup of tea on another. As a new kid on the block we had upbeat dream but due to the situation we couldn’t think out of out of that sense of nihilism.
The news paper had a front page news article –Good news (ভাল খৱৰ) by SKC.
It was neither about negativity nor an optimistic article talking about a utopian tomorrow.
But after reading it I felt better and it made me believe that there can be a better tomorrow while living with the darkness at hand.

Saturday 10 December 2011

Demystifying the best seller’s techniques




Down, alone and having time to kill after failing in doing anything creative I looked for some inspiration. I surfed through my 200 GB of world classic movie collection –Pier Paolo Pasolini. Claude Chabrol   Jean-Luc Godard (from 1980 onward); well…after few hours I couldn’t concentrate on any one and most of them had a negative affect on me as well.
I was down and the theme, content, negativity of those entire movies was nauseating.
In past also I had gone through passes like this (dark)  I stopped and tried to finish Terra Amata by French author and Nobel laureate J. M. G. Le Clézio.
I found it was about nothingness  my recurring theme. It’s been six months and I am halfway through the book, it seems I will need three more months (and three bout of depression) to finish it. Nothingness and the negativity associated with it were becoming repulsive, so I kept the book aside.
Thankfully after a couple of days I fell sick and this time I didn’t dared  to venture into the mistake I made just 2 days before.
Again I had to kill the time this time I decided to do it with something light and palatable.
I opened R 2020.
By evening I finished the book.
And after finishing it (me Mr. dark painter as my friend decodes me for my passivity) I too had some good vibes.
Mr Bhagat has become a phenomenon .You may love him or you may hat him, but you can not ignore him, what makes him what he is, I pondered.
After many months I picked up my pen started writing it down on my diary.
As I was blank so I thought of typing and uploading those 11 points (read 5.5 x2)
I wrote:
He is what he is because he could hold the nerve of the Indian reader because He
  1. Writes in (simple) English
  2. Use short sentences (the Nobel aspirants consumes one paragraph for one sentence) with words that most of us use when they are (ab) using English.
  3. The most of the narratives are in conversations, not about subplot or mental mind game, smell, taste, scenery of the place. For all those he uses only one or two sentence so that reader can understand where the characters are and what they are feeling about. Thankfully most bad times pass very fast keeping the reader happy.
  4. Love / romance will be there -unabashed .Most of the Nobel aspirant will try to write what is real /Mr .Bhagat will write what we fantasize about it-boy meet girl then he meets /hates /fights ….. (and whether movie ,music or popular literature romance sells)
  5. The theme will be about something to which common people (read target audience, mostly youth) could relate to.
  6. the protagonist tells the common feeling of a young guy (about girls ,sex, rich ,…..or common thought bubble of the youth )
  7. Enough of humour and satire in every page so that no one is bored.
  8. Sex –at the time when it seems reader are losing the grip, it freshen the mind up, so that writer can give you the final punch.
  9. The protagonist will do the thing that most of the target reader do like –eating in Café Coffee day ,loitering in a popular hangout places(CP  , Dasaswamedh Ghat etc)
  10. At the end the protagonist (a looser like most of us) become a winner (morally) and also to the eye of the reader (his main objective).
  11.  Most importantly  There is a story –an opening ,a climax ,an ending (with a twist )  .He will not try any other new/unknown / zigzag narrative literary style (like most Noble aspirant do)  
Still there are many following the trend written above but this man is far ahead.

There are criticism against him also ,But I strongly feels in a democracy we all follow a cafeteria approach .You have all in the menu but reader have the right to choose /discard among all .